Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Stick and Tissue Logo
 
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Interested in a winter trimotor cookup (Read 5472 times)
Reply #33 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 2:36pm

alfakilo   Offline
Global Moderator
Retired USAF and TWA.
St Louis, MO

Posts: 945
****
 
On to the stab and wing engines.
 

cou_build_4.jpg (119 KB | 22 )
cou_build_4.jpg
cou_build_5.jpg (135 KB | 18 )
cou_build_5.jpg
cou_build_6.jpg (126 KB | 25 )
cou_build_6.jpg
IP Logged
 
Reply #32 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 11:26am

Sky9pilot   Offline
Administrator
Stick & Tissue
Kelso, WA 98626 USA

Posts: 10919
*****
 
Love the caricature of the "125" Grin Cheesy Wink
This is going to be a very interesting model.  I look forward to your approach!
Tom
 

If God is your Co-pilot...switch seats...
Your attitude will determine your altitude!- John Maxwell
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Jn 8:32
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 11:21am

Kerak   Offline
Senior Member
I Love YaBB 2.5 AE!
Roy, Utah

Posts: 2292
****
 
I've found that a nice box sub-structure fuselage allows for considerable weight-savings.  On the other hand...on a model that utilizes anything more than flat sided surfaces...gets a bit more involved.

As Alf stated...a good 3-view is the key to a buildable plan.

Here's my latest struggle thus far....fuselage is about 16" in length.  I've actually considered constructing a simple box fuselage model...forget all the curves.  Wink  Don't believe this is an exact scale endeavor....

Incidentally, the YC-125 was the last propeller-driven tri-motor configuration aircraft used by the United States military establishment.

Neal
 

P1170825.jpg (56 KB | 19 )
P1170825.jpg
YC-125.jpg (72 KB | 18 )
YC-125.jpg
IP Logged
 
Reply #30 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 8:07am

alfakilo   Offline
Global Moderator
Retired USAF and TWA.
St Louis, MO

Posts: 945
****
 
bigrip74 wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:05pm:
alf, how did you draw you plans so fast? Great job Smiley on a really interesting airplane.

Bob


Bob, usually I don't take the time to draw a plan in the conventional sense. I've found that the fuselage is typically the most difficult part to get right. If I can find a three view that can be enlarged then I'll use it to estimate the shape of fuselage formers. I like the keel method of construction much more than the box method.

For the Couzinet, I found a website that had pictures of fuselage formers of the actual aircraft and used those to start the project. I'm using a cracked rib method for the wing that makes things easier as well.

Finally, Mike mentioned the wing fillets. There were a number of versions of this aircraft with differences primarily in fuselage length. The long version used a large fillet that I'm planning on avoiding for three reasons...too much work, I don't like the looks of it, and I don't think it is aerodynamically necessary in model of this size. So, I'm making a composite model that blends the best parts of the 70 and 71 versions while keeping the build simple and easy.
 

couzinet_model_70.jpg (167 KB | 16 )
couzinet_model_70.jpg
couzinet_model_71.jpg (186 KB | 20 )
couzinet_model_71.jpg
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:05pm

bigrip74   Offline
Administrator
What did l do this time!
Austin, Texas

Posts: 6043
*****
 
alf, how did you draw you plans so fast? Great job Smiley on a really interesting airplane.

Bob
 

IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT!
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 1:12pm

MKelly   Offline
Senior Member
Helotes, TX

Posts: 815
****
 
Love the RATO picture!

Mike
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 1:00pm

Kerak   Offline
Senior Member
I Love YaBB 2.5 AE!
Roy, Utah

Posts: 2292
****
 
Looks like we've already started....  Northrop YC-125 Raider was an aircraft contracted for by the AAF/USAF in 1946 to fill the need for a purposely designed arctic transport/rescue mission.  Obviously three engines were considered more reliable than the conventional two under such extreme operating conditions.  As things turned out, the YC-125's operational career with the military was relatively short lived (ten years).  I can see a Fairchild C-119 hidden in that fuselage...or even a future C-130. Wink  Northrop's design did soldier on as a civilian passenger ship well into the 1950's.  Two examples exist today...one at the Pima Air and Space Museum (AZ) and the other at the National Museum of the United States Air Force (OH).

Like Alf stated...slow going, design as we go...a rare bird (no plans)...the Northrop YC-125 Raider (mil) or Pioneer (civ).  Key was to find a decent 3-view that can be utilized as a building plan...arrange the layout for modification...convert to PDF for scaled printing...and then have at it.  Last plan view is of a solid carved model from 1950...gives me a clue as to bulkhead shapes...not that I'll stick with it.  Grin

I'd like to create a box fuselage...but it might be easier to go with the half-shell system.  I'm looking for quick n' easy as possible.  Model will have a 20"ws.

Neal
 

air-force1.jpg (9 KB | 16 )
air-force1.jpg
air-force2.jpg (13 KB | 22 )
air-force2.jpg
air-force3.jpg (8 KB | 17 )
air-force3.jpg
c125-1.jpg (37 KB | 15 )
c125-1.jpg
c125-2.jpg (29 KB | 19 )
c125-2.jpg
Northrop-YC-125.jpg (62 KB | 16 )
Northrop-YC-125.jpg
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:23am

MKelly   Offline
Senior Member
Helotes, TX

Posts: 815
****
 
Great start AK - and you thought the fillets on the Gamma were big!

I pulled out the SM.79 plan this morning - forgot how big a model this is (34-3/4" span).  I can see some structure changes I want to make and I'll have to decide whether I want to scale it down a bit.

Great to see airframes coming together already.

Cheers,

Mike
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 10:41pm

alfakilo   Offline
Global Moderator
Retired USAF and TWA.
St Louis, MO

Posts: 945
****
 
Yep, Tom, I agree. Used the Dremel this afternoon to hollow out the formers before any more stringers went on. I'm using soft wood, 1/32 formers and stringers, so it was a chore with a number of broken pieces. The extended tail is particularly fragile since it's mostly two dimensional with little cross bracing.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 9:35pm

Sky9pilot   Offline
Administrator
Stick & Tissue
Kelso, WA 98626 USA

Posts: 10919
*****
 
AK...that's looking great.  If you're going to run a central prop, you might want to start the holes in the formers while they're easy to get to.  I love the look of it already!! Smiley

I've started the Rohrback Roland from the color three view but the plan and side view are not to scale with each other so some tweaking was required.  We'll see how this comes out!
Tom
 

If God is your Co-pilot...switch seats...
Your attitude will determine your altitude!- John Maxwell
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Jn 8:32
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 12:19pm

New Builder   Offline
Senior Member
Amherstburg, Ontario, Canada

Posts: 1051
****
 
AK - Really nice beginning. I'll be watching along.
Mike
 

Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it. (Salvador Dali 1904 - 1989)
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 12:06pm

alfakilo   Offline
Global Moderator
Retired USAF and TWA.
St Louis, MO

Posts: 945
****
 
Off and running on the Couzinet. Given the variety of similar looking versions, this will be a combination of the 70 and 71.

No plan so it's build as you go with considerable fitting and adjusting along the way.
 

cou_71_a.jpg (67 KB | 18 )
cou_71_a.jpg
cou_build_1.jpg (31 KB | 18 )
cou_build_1.jpg
cou_build_2.jpg (30 KB | 18 )
cou_build_2.jpg
cou_build_3.jpg (60 KB | 17 )
cou_build_3.jpg
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Jan 25th, 2019 at 7:06pm

bigrip74   Offline
Administrator
What did l do this time!
Austin, Texas

Posts: 6043
*****
 
Tom, here are some research photos and a couple of links on the Rohrback.
 

Rohrbach_Roland.pdf (434 KB | 26 )

IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT!
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Jan 25th, 2019 at 6:34pm

Sky9pilot   Offline
Administrator
Stick & Tissue
Kelso, WA 98626 USA

Posts: 10919
*****
 
That would be a real neat peanut Bob!!!  I'm considering drawing up the Rohrback VIII Roland for you and myself!  I love the looks and the scheme!
Tom
 

If God is your Co-pilot...switch seats...
Your attitude will determine your altitude!- John Maxwell
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Jn 8:32
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Jan 25th, 2019 at 6:21pm

bigrip74   Offline
Administrator
What did l do this time!
Austin, Texas

Posts: 6043
*****
 
Neal, that is  really good looking subject. Not too much bracing, engine nacelles, or intricate landing gear stuff Wink I just need to talk Tom into drawing up a set of plans.

Tom, I ran across this Stinson Model U trimotor which looks like an easier build than the Ford.
 

IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT!
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print