Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Obscure Aircraft Cookup (Read 2734 times)
Kittyfritters
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


Stick & Tissue

Posts: 684
Location: California
Joined: Feb 24th, 2011
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #18 - Nov 22nd, 2019 at 1:34pm
Print Post  
You know, what constitutes an obscure aircraft depends upon where you live. For example in the US, few have heard of the Ikarus IK-2 however, if you are a modeler in the (former) Yugoslavia you will definitely know about it.  It's on my to build list.


KF
  

( 322 KB | 9 Downloads )
Ikarus-IK-2-2104_03.png

Qua sublata omnia praecepta legis
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Kerak
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


Build! Fly! Enjoy!

Posts: 2601
Location: Roy, Utah
Joined: Oct 5th, 2015
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #17 - Mar 25th, 2019 at 2:49pm
Print Post  
"Bigger does fly better," for obvious reasons...the only thing that's scale is the wing...not the air.  Wink  If you embark on the journey...go bigger.  You're doin' a lot of homework not to tackle the big challenge.  Cheesy Grin Smiley

Neal
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alfakilo
Global Moderator
****
Offline


Retired USAF and TWA.

Posts: 1209
Location: St Louis, MO
Joined: Jan 18th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #16 - Mar 25th, 2019 at 10:23am
Print Post  
Kerak wrote on Mar 23rd, 2019 at 7:08pm:
What's the wingspan?

Here's the next step...scab a motor stick onto the side...with rubber motor and prop. 


13".

The motor idea is sorta like a No-Cal set-up...sounds like a good middle step before going for a full build.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
staubkorb
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


Stick & Tissue

Posts: 1328
Location: Germany
Joined: Oct 22nd, 2008
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #15 - Mar 25th, 2019 at 10:02am
Print Post  
Hey AK, that C1 could be made to fly as you've already determined.  Increasing the span of the canard will definitely help (retain the chord), but you could reduce the incidence to about 5° and get rid of some of the nose weight.  Dihedral  is OK.

The F19 Ente has been successfully rc'd as a large scale model so it could very well work Free Fright.
----------------------

Would this qualify as "obscure"?  The Swedish SAAB J-21a is not that well known or modeled and was further developed into Sweden's first jet fighter.
  

( 6 KB | 7 Downloads )
220px-J-21-Intro.jpg

WWWoFF
Wonderful Wacky World of Free Flight
(with a bit of rc thrown in for giggles)

Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Kerak
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


Build! Fly! Enjoy!

Posts: 2601
Location: Roy, Utah
Joined: Oct 5th, 2015
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #14 - Mar 23rd, 2019 at 7:08pm
Print Post  
Wow!  That is really great, Alf!  What's the wingspan?

Here's the next step...scab a motor stick onto the side...with rubber motor and prop.  Keep the provision to enable moving the CG...see how it's location changes.  Don't you wonder if the original designers/builders did any of this?

Really...that would be a great model all by itself if it were given a legit color scheme!

Super job!  Unique et magnifique! Smiley

Neal
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alfakilo
Global Moderator
****
Offline


Retired USAF and TWA.

Posts: 1209
Location: St Louis, MO
Joined: Jan 18th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #13 - Mar 23rd, 2019 at 3:29pm
Print Post  
This is a peanut sized glider based on the deBruyere C1. Initially, I balanced it as shown but with more weight to make the fuselage longitudinal axis level. The balance point was estimated using the CG from other canard designs.

These other designs suggested a larger canard with considerable dihedral and some incidence thrown in for good measure. Dihedral was added to the upper and lower wings. The tail remained per the original plan.

The initial glide tests resulted in a definite nose heaviness. I removed one of the weights and got a reasonable glide out of it, with several repeated similar results, enough to suggest that the design may actually work! The pics show that the model balances in a nose up attitude.
  

( 36 KB | 5 Downloads )
de_bruyer_test_1.jpg
( 33 KB | 4 Downloads )
de_bruyer_test_2.jpg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
neoflight
3 Star Member
***
Offline


...now how am I gonna
get that down!

Posts: 231
Location: West Tennessee
Joined: Feb 15th, 2019
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #12 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 10:30pm
Print Post  
This might fit the bill

Per Wikipedia,

The F 19 Ente was a high-wing monoplane with a canard layout and fixed tricycle undercarriage. The pilot sat in an open cockpit, while an enclosed cabin was provided for two or three passengers. The canard was mounted on short struts above the nose of the aircraft, ahead of the cockpit, and the two engines were housed in nacelles mounted under the wings.

The F 19 design was set so that the front stabilizer would stall some moments before the rear-mounted main wing, which in theory made the Ente virtually stall-proof.

The first example flew on 2 September 1927 but was destroyed on 29 September during a demonstration of single-engine flight, after a control rod snapped. Focke-Wulf co-founder Georg Wulf was killed in the crash. Nevertheless, a second aircraft (D-1960) was built, flying in late 1930.[2] This was used for a promotional tour of Europe the following year which took it to Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, and the UK. On 7 November 1931, it was demonstrated at Hanworth Air Park, flown by Focke-Wulf chief pilot Cornelius Edzard.

Later, it was put on display at the Deutsche Luftfahrtsammlung in Berlin, where it was destroyed in an Allied air raid in 1944.

  

( 115 KB | 7 Downloads )
fw19_ente_3v.jpg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alfakilo
Global Moderator
****
Offline


Retired USAF and TWA.

Posts: 1209
Location: St Louis, MO
Joined: Jan 18th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #11 - Mar 14th, 2019 at 12:57am
Print Post  
Wiki says the airplane got about 25 feet into the air and then rolled inverted and crashed. If we go down the roll stability line of thinking, then some things are apparent...no dihedral anywhere, short wingspan, odd aileron concept that may have contributed to roll problems. Other than that, little info found so far.

I think a test glider is a good idea! Bigger foreplane with considerable dihedral, added dihedral to main wings, eliminate the weird ailerons, CG forward of the wing leading edge.
« Last Edit: Mar 16th, 2019 at 7:31am by alfakilo »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kerak
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


Build! Fly! Enjoy!

Posts: 2601
Location: Roy, Utah
Joined: Oct 5th, 2015
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #10 - Mar 13th, 2019 at 8:50pm
Print Post  
Now that is really an unusual design, Alf.  Be helpful to have some info as to what the aircraft did on its initial flight attempt...nose/tail heavy...got the CG wrong?  If you're serious about getting it to fly...might help to come up with some kind of mockup...a general configuration you can make "adjustments" to...and once you've got her floating along...launch into a full-blown scale version.  How about something like a dime(nickel)-glider?

That is a wild design...would have been great if it had proven successful!  Very advanced! Smiley  I'd be tempted to "hedge" on that wingspan as well...longer...as well as the foreplane (canard).

Just my thoughts.... Wink

Neal
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alfakilo
Global Moderator
****
Offline


Retired USAF and TWA.

Posts: 1209
Location: St Louis, MO
Joined: Jan 18th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #9 - Mar 13th, 2019 at 3:34pm
Print Post  
Here is something not seen often, a French WW1 pusher that really pushes the envelope. If I dive into this, I'll be counting on you folks to help get this thing into the air!

I'm thinking of building a peanut sized glider first to see if there's any chance of it flying. I'm starting with the assumption that the airplane needed dihedral and a bigger foreplane.

Oh, and I think it's pronounced like "duh brew-yeah".
  

( 64 KB | 7 Downloads )
de-bruyere-c1-experimental-fighter-aircraft-france_4.jpg
( 33 KB | 3 Downloads )
de_b_c1.jpg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sky9pilot
Administrator
*****
Offline


Stick & Tissue

Posts: 11694
Location: Kelso, WA 98626 USA
Joined: Jan 9th, 2010
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #8 - Feb 10th, 2019 at 1:07pm
Print Post  
Another great airplane and nice find.  My guess on the thing sticking up behind the engine was an exhaust vent to keep the exhaust out of the cockpit while doing ground test and engine runups...IMHO
  

If God is your Co-pilot...switch seats...
Your attitude will determine your altitude!- John Maxwell
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Jn 8:32
Back to top
IP Logged
 
alfakilo
Global Moderator
****
Offline


Retired USAF and TWA.

Posts: 1209
Location: St Louis, MO
Joined: Jan 18th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #7 - Feb 10th, 2019 at 9:58am
Print Post  
This Vultee V-11T probably qualifies! Pres Bruning has a peanut plan for it. Anyone have an idea what that thing sticking up behind the engine is? The airplane was used for engine testing.
  

( 66 KB | 2 Downloads )
V-11T_1.jpg
( 21 KB | 4 Downloads )
V-11T_2.jpg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
shipwreck
4 Star Member
****
Offline


Navy Vet

Posts: 287
Location: Medina Ohio
Joined: Jun 20th, 2018
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #6 - Feb 8th, 2019 at 5:30pm
Print Post  
I started a Mystery Tailless fiction fighter years ago but never finished it. Just brushed the dust off of it. If this qualifies for this I would be in.
Paul
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
pb_guy
5 Star Member
*****
Offline


So I'm just a kid at heart.

Posts: 1650
Location: Youbou, BC, Vancouver Island
Joined: Oct 15th, 2014
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #5 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 4:22pm
Print Post  
I think that anything posted in the mystery aircraft section would qualify as well as anything that was a one-off, or that was an obvious experimental version of a known aircraft, like the Grumman XF4F-3S WildCatfish.
ian
  

( 185 KB | 4 Downloads )
WildCatfish.jpg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
New Builder
5 Star Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1268
Location: Amherstburg, Ontario, Canada
Joined: Dec 25th, 2016
Re: Obscure Aircraft Cookup
Reply #4 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 6:40am
Print Post  
I can't join either, I'm up to my elbows in the Marcoux Bromberg and I have come to realize that I don't have the time and, as with Mike, I build way to slow as well. Would, however, like the definition of "obscure" that you will be using. Look forward to the outcome and some terrific models.
Mike
  

"Skill comes by the constant repetition of familiar feats rather than by a few overbold attempts for which the performer is yet poorly prepared." Wilbur Wright
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint